It is overly complex and does a piss poor job of doing so. Muse is intended to take a print layout and "convert" itįor web use. I've spoken with people on the Adobe Muse team which is part of the InDesign team. If you want my take on why Muse is not an adequate replacement for Expression Web any more than MS Word is take a look at “…which means you are going first in Double Jeopardy.” Things Liberal Arts graduates never like to hear: Index your site, you need to build the site using semantic markup, something that Muse (and the rest) cannot do. And if you want search engines to be able to properly And those drag-and-drop programs and services just can't do that. Mice, on 7 operating systems, and any of 8 common browsers-with their own custom user settings), you need a site that is properly built.
MICROSOFT EXPRESSION WEB WIKIPEDIA PROFESSIONAL
But if Aunt Tilly (or you or VSLA) want to make a site to share vacation photos with a few family members, go ahead and useīut if you have a business that needs to present a professional face to the public (who are visiting using all kinds of hardware, operating in both landscape and portrait mode, with screen resolutions that vary by 600% or more, using touch screens and We're here to guide people to use best practices building the kinds of sites that are the target market for EW (and Dreamweaver). That's not cool if you want to keep visitors coming The excessive, bloated code-that exists only so that clueless amateurs can play web designer-not only slows loading of the site, but uses up excessive amounts of the visitor's monthly bandwidth allotment. In a day when so much browsing is done on smartphones and tablets and wireless laptops with 2G, 3G, and 4G connections, It's not that they write "ugly code" (although they do) it's that they write non-standard code. That is something that none of the programs or online website builders that VSLA (or you) listed can do.
EW is a professional website design tool that creates "Why is it that one should not "even think about Muse"? "īecause the actual question was asking for a
0 kommentar(er)
